Max(Reward) Control

 

 At the end of the day, we are interested in measuring the probability of gaining max(Reward) from an investment. In doing so, we calculate Return on Investment (ROI) as follows [1,3]:

ROI=[(Net Return)/Cost]*100%= (Capital Gains)-Commission+(Dividend Yield)

and

Annualized ROI = [(1+ROI)**(1/n)-1]*100%,

where n is the number of investment years.  

It is clear that the negative values ROI<0 mean that total costs are greater than returns (red score), whereas positive values ROI>0 indicate that net returns are positive because total returns are greater than any associated costs (green/amber). Even though ROI is a direct measure of profitability, it does not adjust for risk.

Both ROI and Return On Equity (ROE) are popular measures of financial performance and profitability [1]. While ROI is total profit divided by your initial investment,  ROE, on the other hand, measures how much profit a company generates when compared to its shareholders' equity.  Because shareholders' equity is equal to a company’s assets minus its debt, ROE is considered the return on net assets. The ROE formula is

ROE = 100% * (Annual Net Income)/(Average Shareholder’s Equity),

where net income is a company's income after deducting expenses (a company's annual net income is reported on its income statement) and shareholder's equity is the claim shareholders have on a company's assets, after its debts are paid (shareholder's equity is reported on the balance sheet). Here is the real-life example of ROE from www.businessinsider.com: according to FB’s most recent SEC filings, its net income in 2020 was about $29.15 B, total stockholder’s equity was $128.29 B, and so

ROE(FB)= $29.15 B / $128.29 B = 0.227 x 100 = 22.7%

That means that its annual net income is about 22.7% of its shareholders' equity. You can now look very carefully at how FB was performing compared to its peers and the outcome it's delivering.  

The above two ratios are not operational metrics. To compare business efficiency, you should look at the simplest bang-for-the-buck ratio such as Return on Assets (ROA)[1]

ROA = (Net Income)/(Total Assets)

As you can see, ROA is calculated by dividing a company’s net income by total assets. For example, if a company's ROA is 5%, this means the company earns 5 cents per $1 in assets. Higher ROA indicates more asset efficiency. ROAs over 5% are generally considered acceptable (Amber) and over 20% excellent (Green). For the sake of apple-to-apple comparison, ROAs should always be compared amongst firms in the same sector. A software maker, for instance, will have far fewer assets on the balance sheet than a car maker. As an investor, you can begin by comparing a company's ROA % from one year to another and looking for trends or changes. Doing this can help you determine whether a company is likely to have potential issues in the future (this is also a part of product de-risking).  

The EBITDA Margin is another useful performance metric related to a company's profitability from operations [47]

EBITDA Margin = EBITDA / Revenue,

Revenue = Net Sales

and

EBITDA = Operating Income (EBIT) + Depreciation + Amortization

It measures how much in earnings a company is generating before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as a percentage of revenue. EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization [1]. Quarterly earnings press releases often cite EBITDA. The earnings are calculated by taking sales revenue and deducting operating expenses, such as the cost of goods sold (COGS), selling, general, & administrative expenses (SG&A), but excluding depreciation and amortization. For example, Company A has an EBITDA of $800,000 while their total revenue is $8,000,000. The EBITDA margin is 10%. Company B has an EBITDA of $960,000 and total revenue of $12,000,000. This means that while Company B demonstrates higher EBITDA, it actually has a smaller margin than Company A (8% against 10%). Therefore, an investor will see more potential in Company A [1].  

The above financial metrics are often complementary to the most common profitability ratios: Gross Profit, Net Profit, Operating Margin and Net/Gross Profit Margin [48]. The gross profit is the surplus or difference between the net sales and the cost of goods sold:

Gross Profit = Revenue(Sales) − Cost of Goods Sold

The gross profit margin is the percentage of the profits over the revenue.

Gross Profit Margin = 100%*(Revenue/Sales − Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue(Sales)  

For example, a gross profit margin ratio of 65% is considered to be healthy.

The net profit often refers to the “bottom line”. It is the net income that is derived from subtracting the net sales from total costs including taxes

 

Net Profit = Net sales - Total Costs = Revenue – (COGS + Operating Costs+Interest+Tax),

The net profit margin refers to how much profit your business has generated as a percentage of your total revenue: 

 Net Profit Margin = (Net Profit / Revenue) x 100%

As a general rule of thumb, a 10% net profit margin is considered average, a 20% margin is considered good, and a 5% margin is low.

The operating margin is a measure that shows the percentage of operating income to the company's revenues. Operating margin provides a glimpse of how much a company makes on every dollar it earns:

Operating Margin = Operating Income / Net Sales

Higher operating margins are generally better than lower operating margins, so it might be fair to state that the only good operating margin is one that is positive and increasing over time. For example, GOOG produced an operating margin of 31.3% in 2021, the company's highest since early 2012. 





Comments

  1. Let’s return back to monitoring of stock markets. All things considered, you certainly don’t want your investment would go right down to the wire. We need to assess the company’s performance or financial health using additional metrics such as (among others) total return of a dividend stock or Total Stock Return (TSR), earnings per share (EPS) discussed above, the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E), the price/earnings-to-growth (PEG) that takes earnings growth into account, and dividend growth rate versus yield (DY) [32]. Detailed explanations of these metrics are given below.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The formula for the TSR is as follows:
    TSR=(P1-P0+D)/P0,
    where P0 and P1 are the initial and ending prices of the stock, while D are the dividends. For example, if we have originally paid $20 for a single share of a particular company and the stock has paid dividends of $4.5 for the holding period and we have sold the stock at a price of $24. The TSR would be ($24-$20+$4.5)/$20*100% = 42.5%. TSR is a good gauge of an investment's long-term value, but it is limited to past performance, requires an investment to generate cash flows, and can be sensitive to stock market volatility [1].
    The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio is a common valuation metric used to measure a company’s equity value in relation to its net earnings [45]. Simply put, the P/E ratio of a company represents the amount that investors are currently willing to pay for $1 of the company’s net profit mentioned above. The ratio is used for valuing companies and to find out whether they are overvalued or undervalued.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The formula for the P/E Ratio (PER) involves dividing the latest closing share price by its earnings per share [1]
    PER=Share Price / EPS = Equity Value/Net Income
    It involves the following three steps:
    1.Finding the market price of each share of the company (e.g. NASDAG and other stock exchange websites);
    2.Evaluating the per-share earnings of the company (cf. the organization’s profit on Yahoo/Google Finance, etc.);
    3.Divide the price per stock (step 1) by EPS (step 2) to get the PER estimate.
    For example, as of December 31, 2020, the stock price of X Inc. was $200. The company has earnings per share of $1 in 2020. Now, figure out its PER for 2020. Let’s assume there is another company A Ltd. whose PER=250. You can find out which investment opportunity of X and A is more beneficial. It appears that PER(X)=$200/$1=200. This means an investment of $200 in X Inc. will yield $1. The PER of A Ltd. is 250, while that of X Inc. is 200. Clearly, X Inc. is a better option because PER(A)>PER(X).

    ReplyDelete
  4. A high PER generally indicates increased demand because investors anticipate earnings growth in the future. The PER has units of years, which can be interpreted as the number of years of earnings to pay back purchase price. The trailing PER is calculated using the earnings from the actual performance in the last twelve months. The forward PER is calculated using the forecasted net earnings of a company. Note that YCharts (https://ycharts.com/) uses the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) sum of Net EPS Diluted in the denominator, and the numerator is the price at the end of the given period. In DCF, change in growth rate assumptions can dramatically change the valuations. PER is free of this limitation. That’s why it is extensively used for comparing companies within a sector.

    ReplyDelete
  5. PER Example: Let’s consider a company A which reported a net income of $36 million in 2020. The company had 8 million shares in Q1 2020 and 10 million shares in Q4 2020. The current share price is $40. Firstly, the Average Outstanding Shares (AOS) is expressed as
    AOS = (Opening Outstanding Shares + Closing Outstanding Shares) / 2
    This yields AOS=(10 million + 8 million)/2=9 million.
    Then EPS = Net Income / Average Outstanding Shares = $36 million / 9 million = $4
    Finally, PER = Share Price / Earnings Per Share = $40/$4 = 10
    The tech market average PER currently ranges from 20-25, so a higher PER above that could be considered bad, while a lower PER could be considered better. For example, technology companies generally have a very high average PER of 17, while public utility companies tend to have a much lower PER of 3.
    As discussed above, it is straightforward to check if a company A is over or undervalued. You just have to compare its PER(A) with the PER(M) ratio of market and peers. If PER(A)>PER(M), the stock A is overvalued and vice versa. However, PER does not take into account the Annual Growth Rate (AFR) of the company. This is where the P/E to growth ratio (PEG ratio) comes into the picture. The P/E to Growth ratio (PEG ratio) is a stock's PER divided by the growth rate of its earnings for a specified time period [1,46]
    PEG Ratio = (Price Per Share / Earning Per Share) / Growth Rate of Earnings

    ReplyDelete
  6. The PEG ratio can help an investor put a price on a company’s rate of growth. A company that’s expected to grow its revenue, all other things being equal, more valuable than a company with little growth opportunity [46]. A company with a PER of 10 and an expected growth rate of 5%, for example, would have a PEG ratio of 2 (10 / 5). The serious drawback of this formula is that it requires a future growth rate. One can base a growth estimate on past growth rates, but past growth rates are not always indicative of a company’s future prospects. Here is the real-life example based on recent analysis the PEG ratio for Apple, Inc (AAPL) [46]: Zacks reported PEG(APPL|Zacks)=3.68 using both TTM (trailing 12 months) for EPS and growth, whereas Morningstar reported PEG(APPL|Morningstar)=2.66 using mean EPS estimate for the current fiscal year. This discrepancy indicates that an investor should consider making a range of growth estimates to determine growth confidence intervals, variance or STDEV.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now let’s compare PEG ratios of two IT companies, say IBM and Cognizant. Using their recent financial statements, we can calculate the PEG ratio as follows:
    Table 2: Comparison of IBM and CTSH in terms of PEG
    Metrics IBM CTSH
    Current Share Price $ 139.46 72.25
    EPS $ 9.5 3.6
    Growth Estimate % 2 11
    PER 14.68 20.07
    PEG Ratio 7.34 1.82
    It appears that PER(IBM)>PEG(CTSH). So, CTSH is more overvalued than IBM in terms of PER alone. On the other hand, PEG ratios show that CTSH is cheaper than IBM if we take growth into account. Therefore, we would go for CTSH based on PEG.
    The Bottom Line: According to well-known investor Peter Lynch, a company's PER and expected growth should be equal, which denotes a fairly valued company and supports a the value PEG=1.0. When a company's PEG exceeds 1.0, it's considered overvalued while a stock with a PEG of less than 1.0 is considered undervalued [1].

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heads-Up: Upswing Resilient Investor Guide - Min(Risk) Control

Appendix B: More Real World Examples